Nevertheless, many deficiencies remain in global health governance, which create suboptimal outcomes for individual and population health. This Working Paper, sponsored by CFR's International ...
President Trump’s decision to pull out of the international health agency could deprive the United States of crucial ...
How America's legacy of combating threats to global health security - including at home in the United States - is at risk.
The Trump administration’s withdrawal of the United States from the World Health Organisation is a decision that reverberates ...
Partnership is essential for solving complex global challenges. In global health, however, partnership has become associated with a specific model: public–private partnerships (PPPs), in which the key ...
As the largest financial contributor to the WHO, the U.S. provides most of the organization’s funding, amounting to more than ...
In response to the new US administration’s policies endangering children and global health, we need to reconstruct the ...
With Donald Trump’s plans to cut ties with the World Health Organisation (WHO), the international agency stands to lose not only $1 billion but one of the most influential actors on global health.
Our research examines how global health challenges manifest themselves as international affairs problems. Our global health programme focuses on analysing and informing efforts to prevent global ...
Global governance is the way of dealing with global issues. It is well-recognized that globalization is not the cause of ...
US President Donald Trump has pulled the United States out of the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization (WHO) - ...
Facing financial shortfalls and political interference, multilateral bodies might struggle to fulfil their mandates. This ...