Here’s a look at what the Trump administration’s decision to cut overhead funding for biomedical research means for ...

President Trump last Friday slashed billions from scientific research grants — effective Monday. Trump has taken issue with ...

The University of Pennsylvania said the funding that was at risk of being cut before a restraining order took effect supports ...

The National Institute of Health (NIH) announced that they are cutting grants that support research institutions nationwide ...

The Trump administration's plan to cut billions of dollars from National Institutes of Health funding would devastate ...

Hours later, the Massachusetts Attorney General issued a temporary restraining order preventing the NIH from immediately ...

An oncologist and NIH-funded T-cell researcher said that without adequate indirect funding, labs will shrink, clinical trials ...

With funding from the NIH earmarked by the Autism CARES Act, researchers aim to pinpoint the environmental factors that ...

The National Institutes of Health said it will cap indirect grant funds, threatening billions of dollars in health systems' ...

These indirect costs are negotiated with each research institution and average close to 30 percent of the amount awarded for ...

A separate lawsuit filed by the state of California resulted in a temporary restraining order blocking the NIH order.

We urge the NIH to honor its current funding commitments. The future of American biomedical research is too important to do anything less.